tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post7494959418248335340..comments2008-10-10T16:31:10.969-04:00T.S.noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-21137172242829237672008-10-10T14:05:00.000-04:002008-10-10T14:05:00.000-04:00I understand you argument here, but I still like it a little more than you do. It's not among his best British films, but neither is it one of his worst. The technique is indeed the thing here, and for me that makes it modestly fascinating despite the slight narrative.Sam Julianonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-40460652022305276922008-10-10T08:49:00.000-04:002008-10-10T08:49:00.000-04:00Hi! T.S.,<BR/>I must say you really have <I>"piqued"</I> my curiosity!...<BR/>When it comes to watching this film just to view the "bizarre composition and silent film technique(s) that Hitchcock used in his 1931 film called <B>"Rich and Strange."</B> <BR/><BR/>I do own this film, but I haven't watched it yet!...I plan to "rectify" that "slight" oversight later this evening.<BR/><BR/>Tks,<BR/>dcd ;)darkcitydame4ehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06369967577590947967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-12411641362464594292008-10-05T22:00:00.000-04:002008-10-05T22:00:00.000-04:00strangeness huh? hmmm. Might have to give this a rentFarzanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07026623319981761337noreply@blogger.com