<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post7187949810576452985..comments</id><updated>2009-08-19T08:59:24.277-04:00</updated><category term='Chuck Jones'/><category term='Walt Disney'/><category term='Science Fiction'/><category term='Short Films'/><category term='1960s'/><category term='Documentaries'/><category term='Stanley Kubrick'/><category term='F.W. Murnau'/><category term='2000s'/><category term='1920s'/><category term='Oscars'/><category term='1910s'/><category term='French Cinema'/><category term='Westerns'/><category term='Billy Wilder'/><category term='1940s'/><category term='Sound Savour'/><category term='Orson Welles'/><category term='Musicals'/><category term='National Film Registry'/><category term='2008 In Review'/><category term='Howard Hawks'/><category term='Film Noir'/><category term='1970s'/><category term='1950s'/><category term='War Films'/><category term='Horror Films'/><category term='Fritz Lang'/><category term='Silent Films'/><category term='Sight and Sound Top 10'/><category term='Charles Chaplin'/><category term='John Ford'/><category term='1930s'/><category term='Alfred Hitchcock'/><category term='Television'/><category term='German Cinema'/><category term='Sunday Matinee'/><category term='Animation'/><category term='Buster Keaton'/><category term='2009 in Review'/><title type='text'>Comments on Screen Savour: Seven Chances (1925)</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.screensavour.net/feeds/7187949810576452985/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/7187949810576452985/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2009/08/seven-chances-1925.html'/><author><name>T.S.</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='31' src='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_iQQyMY0s_7Q/SYbmii5xNxI/AAAAAAAAA08/Mk6itOHr9NU/S220/Typewriter.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-2533295372793210669</id><published>2009-08-19T08:59:24.277-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-19T08:59:24.277-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Thanks, John. Indeed, I think this is a fine film ...</title><content type='html'>Thanks, John. Indeed, I think this is a fine film compared to most of the muck that&amp;#39;s out there today (though I&amp;#39;m not trying to be a curmudgeon!). Although star ratings essentially don&amp;#39;t matter, I was torn between the one I gave it and one step higher. The finale is as worthy as nearly anything else in Keaton&amp;#39;s filmography, but the first 3/4 or so are standard goodness.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even though it was originally play, I do agree that Keaton has this marvelous ability to build something out of nothing. Considering how much of the play he scrapped, it might as well be something out of nothing -- it&amp;#39;s new enough, at least, and the best parts don&amp;#39;t occur in the source material. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jean Arthur is great in her little cameo. She&amp;#39;s easly spottable, and a bright face to a bright film.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/7187949810576452985/comments/default/2533295372793210669'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/7187949810576452985/comments/default/2533295372793210669'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2009/08/seven-chances-1925.html?showComment=1250686764277#c2533295372793210669' title=''/><author><name>T.S.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00945932279787919282</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='31' src='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_iQQyMY0s_7Q/SYbmii5xNxI/AAAAAAAAA08/Mk6itOHr9NU/S220/Typewriter.jpg'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2009/08/seven-chances-1925.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-7187949810576452985' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/posts/default/7187949810576452985' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-32407462'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-3907737128977425240</id><published>2009-08-16T07:18:42.144-04:00</published><updated>2009-08-16T07:18:42.144-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Another fine review, T.S. 

“After a test screenin...</title><content type='html'>Another fine review, T.S. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;“After a test screening of Seven Chances, during which the audience began laughing riotously after Keaton accidentally dislodged a few small stones while running downhill and caused them to tumble after him, he went back to the scene of the crime and filmed an entirely new sequence with what seems like hundreds of rocks, ranging in sizes from those about as large as a basketball to gigantic boulders. That scene alone is probably the most famous of the film, and a great example of Keaton&amp;#39;s inherent comic instincts and his ability to improvise and deviate from the slated vision for the opportunity to earn more laughs. And it&amp;#39;s here, in the miraculous finale, where the film&amp;#39;s reputation is cemented.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justifiably what you say here is so true. The rock scene is pure Keaton, slowly building something out of nothing. He has accomplished this feat in movie after movie. It is part of what makes his art so amazing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;“Seven Chances” is a good film though no masterpiece, a step below his best work, still it is an excellent film to savor. Film comedies made today should be this good.   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A couple of interesting points. A very young Jean Arthur has a small role in the film as a receptionist at a country club (source for this is IMDB) and  the play was actually purchased for Keaton by his father-in-law ,  producer Joseph Schenck.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A pathetic attempt at a remake of this film was done a few years ago called “The Bachelor” with Chris O’Donnell in the Keaton role. The horror, the horror!</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/7187949810576452985/comments/default/3907737128977425240'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/7187949810576452985/comments/default/3907737128977425240'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2009/08/seven-chances-1925.html?showComment=1250421522144#c3907737128977425240' title=''/><author><name>John</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01808503055317962289</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='15183312040860017376'/><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2009/08/seven-chances-1925.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-7187949810576452985' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/posts/default/7187949810576452985' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1025696812'/></entry></feed>
