tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post4908646599193337014..comments2008-10-14T22:28:32.839-04:00T.S.noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-72364003338783735112008-10-14T22:28:00.000-04:002008-10-14T22:28:00.000-04:00Indeed I agree with everything you say here and yes this was a rush job and a relative failure (and one of his weakest films) but you still write with keen insight.<BR/><BR/>I would have to take REBECCA and SHADOW OF A DOUBT from the second category and put them with his greatest films.Sam Julianonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-54183887408876082512008-10-13T05:04:00.000-04:002008-10-13T05:04:00.000-04:00Hi! T.S.,<BR/>First of all, I agree with the 6 categories in which you placed Hitchcock's films.<BR/><BR/>Secondly, I think <B>"Under Capricorn"</B> (even though it was mildly successful) makes Hitchcock's <B>"Jamaica Inn"</B> look like Gone With The Wind. This is not just a bad movie for Hitchcock, but a bad movie all around."(I vice versa, the film titles in your quote)<BR/><BR/>(I think I started to "cry" while watching Hitch's "Under Capricorn" in hopes that I would soon see the word(s) "The End" or "Finis") But, your point is well taken, you just happen to think that <B>"Jamaica Inn"</B> is the film that leave a "bad taste" in ones' mouth!...Speaking of, "bad taste" and trying to determine which Hitch's film(s)is the worse and fits into the category of six...can only be compared to taking a taste test...For instance, I guess it's like choosing between a bottle of medicine let say, after a taste test, some people may think that bottle <B>"A"</B> taste disgusting and bottle <B>"b"</B> taste even more disgusting...(Or vice versa)<BR/><BR/>Therefore,I think it's a little matter of "taste!"...when it comes to deciding which one of Hitch'S films fits perfectly in the category of no# six!<BR/><BR/><BR/>dcd:)darkcitydame4ehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06369967577590947967noreply@blogger.com