<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post3468829397172461621..comments</id><updated>2008-08-20T22:52:30.620-04:00</updated><category term='Chuck Jones'/><category term='Walt Disney'/><category term='Science Fiction'/><category term='Short Films'/><category term='1960s'/><category term='Documentaries'/><category term='Stanley Kubrick'/><category term='F.W. Murnau'/><category term='2000s'/><category term='1920s'/><category term='Oscars'/><category term='1910s'/><category term='French Cinema'/><category term='Westerns'/><category term='Billy Wilder'/><category term='1940s'/><category term='Sound Savour'/><category term='Orson Welles'/><category term='Musicals'/><category term='National Film Registry'/><category term='2008 In Review'/><category term='Howard Hawks'/><category term='Film Noir'/><category term='1970s'/><category term='1950s'/><category term='War Films'/><category term='Horror Films'/><category term='Fritz Lang'/><category term='Silent Films'/><category term='Sight and Sound Top 10'/><category term='Charles Chaplin'/><category term='John Ford'/><category term='1930s'/><category term='Alfred Hitchcock'/><category term='Television'/><category term='German Cinema'/><category term='Sunday Matinee'/><category term='Animation'/><category term='Buster Keaton'/><category term='2009 in Review'/><title type='text'>Comments on Screen Savour: High Noon (1952)</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.screensavour.net/feeds/3468829397172461621/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/3468829397172461621/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2008/08/high-noon-1952.html'/><author><name>T.S.</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='31' src='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_iQQyMY0s_7Q/SYbmii5xNxI/AAAAAAAAA08/Mk6itOHr9NU/S220/Typewriter.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>5</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-599192172342186778</id><published>2008-08-20T22:52:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T22:52:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Oddly enough, Stagecoach and Man Who Shot Liberty ...</title><content type='html'>Oddly enough, Stagecoach and Man Who Shot Liberty Valance were Ford films that didn't really click with me on initial viewings though the former has grown in my imagination since. At the time I saw Stagecoach I far preferred the darker, more ambiguous style of 40s and 50s films to the spry, lean studio pictures of the 30s. Since then I've really come to appreciate that clean, economical style and it deserves a revisit.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Have you seen Young Mr. Lincoln? Not a Western (a Midwestern I guess) but it may be my favorite Ford - that or The Searchers.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/3468829397172461621/comments/default/599192172342186778'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/3468829397172461621/comments/default/599192172342186778'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2008/08/high-noon-1952.html?showComment=1219287120000#c599192172342186778' title=''/><author><name>MovieMan0283</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11238338958380683893</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2008/08/high-noon-1952.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-3468829397172461621' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/posts/default/3468829397172461621' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-985505097'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-4886851047575644389</id><published>2008-08-20T08:48:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T08:48:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>I do admire the genre (I grew up in a house where ...</title><content type='html'>I do admire the genre (I grew up in a house where westerns were always on television), and particularly Ford's work in it. My appreciation of &lt;I&gt;The Searchers&lt;/I&gt; grows each time I see it. The same can be said for &lt;I&gt;My Darling Clementine&lt;/I&gt;, which also seems to get better the more I watch it. But ultimately neither were films that were instantly likable for me, like Ford's &lt;I&gt;Stagecoach&lt;/I&gt; or &lt;I&gt;The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance&lt;/I&gt;, Howard Hawks's &lt;I&gt;Red River&lt;/I&gt;, William Wellman's &lt;I&gt;The Ox-Bow Incident&lt;/I&gt;, or George Stevens' &lt;I&gt;Shane&lt;/I&gt;.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/3468829397172461621/comments/default/4886851047575644389'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/3468829397172461621/comments/default/4886851047575644389'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2008/08/high-noon-1952.html?showComment=1219236480000#c4886851047575644389' title=''/><author><name>T.S.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00945932279787919282</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2008/08/high-noon-1952.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-3468829397172461621' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/posts/default/3468829397172461621' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-32407462'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-7290414288591589434</id><published>2008-08-19T14:03:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-19T14:03:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Do you generally prefer other westerns to The Sear...</title><content type='html'>Do you generally prefer other westerns to The Searchers, or is it a genre as a whole that sort of leaves you cold - or lukewarm?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/3468829397172461621/comments/default/7290414288591589434'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/3468829397172461621/comments/default/7290414288591589434'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2008/08/high-noon-1952.html?showComment=1219168980000#c7290414288591589434' title=''/><author><name>MovieMan0283</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11238338958380683893</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2008/08/high-noon-1952.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-3468829397172461621' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/posts/default/3468829397172461621' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-985505097'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-6078996632757635842</id><published>2008-08-18T14:54:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-18T14:54:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>MovieMan - So true what you've written about how t...</title><content type='html'>MovieMan - So true what you've written about how the anti-communist/pro-free-association tension works in &lt;I&gt;High Noon&lt;/I&gt;. We only have Foreman's official declaration regarding his script, but the hallmark of any good film (and good audience member) is the ability to see the inherent complexities of it has portraying, sometimes inadvertently, both sides of an issue. And of course the ironic aspect of the Red Scare was that both sides saw themselves as crusaders, standing up against evil (either the far-left communists in Europe or the far-right zealots in America trying to "weed out" communists).&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I agree ultimately with you, too, that &lt;I&gt;The Searchers&lt;/I&gt; is a superior film, although you'll see later this week that the star rating on both &lt;I&gt;The Searchers&lt;/I&gt; and &lt;I&gt;High Noon&lt;/I&gt; is the same. I've long struggled to reconcile my feelings of &lt;I&gt;The Searchers&lt;/I&gt; with mainstream westerns. It is interesting that, despite their different ways of reaching the status of "preeminent western" in the United States, they both stand outside the circled wagons of the western genre. There are cowboys in the west, but fundamentally they are different. It's a greater compliment to Ford, who was able to perform that task with so many of his films.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/3468829397172461621/comments/default/6078996632757635842'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/3468829397172461621/comments/default/6078996632757635842'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2008/08/high-noon-1952.html?showComment=1219085640000#c6078996632757635842' title=''/><author><name>T.S.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00945932279787919282</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2008/08/high-noon-1952.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-3468829397172461621' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/posts/default/3468829397172461621' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-32407462'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-3349634599073385177</id><published>2008-08-18T12:06:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-18T12:06:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>I think Gary Cooper was a friendly witness, so the...</title><content type='html'>I think Gary Cooper was a friendly witness, so the the film's anti-McCarthy credentials might be more ambiguous than Foreman intended. As with Invasion of the Body Snatchers, it could even be read as an anti-communist screed, with liberal America sticking its head in the sand while the true hero faces up to the commies who are threatening the community which would rather ignore them. Certainly On the Waterfront, a film with a similar plot device to High Noon, was intended this way.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Interesting that you respond similarly to High Noon and The Searchers - I think for a while the latter film was celebrated at almost an underground level (though Buddy Holly did adopt John Wayne's catch phrase for his song "That'll Be the Day"). Only in the 70s did it become a standard classic, while all that while High Noon was an above-ground certified "masterpiece," resented by some film buffs as middlebrow and tepid compared to The Searchers. I like both, but definitely prefer Ford's film.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;MovieMan0283&lt;BR/&gt;http://thedancingimage.blogspot.com/</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/3468829397172461621/comments/default/3349634599073385177'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/3468829397172461621/comments/default/3349634599073385177'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2008/08/high-noon-1952.html?showComment=1219075560000#c3349634599073385177' title=''/><author><name>MovieMan0283</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11238338958380683893</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2008/08/high-noon-1952.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-3468829397172461621' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/posts/default/3468829397172461621' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-985505097'/></entry></feed>
