<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post2882451089472285011..comments</id><updated>2009-12-12T11:12:56.039-05:00</updated><category term='Chuck Jones'/><category term='Walt Disney'/><category term='Science Fiction'/><category term='Short Films'/><category term='1960s'/><category term='Documentaries'/><category term='Stanley Kubrick'/><category term='F.W. Murnau'/><category term='2000s'/><category term='1920s'/><category term='Oscars'/><category term='1910s'/><category term='French Cinema'/><category term='Westerns'/><category term='Billy Wilder'/><category term='1940s'/><category term='Sound Savour'/><category term='Orson Welles'/><category term='Musicals'/><category term='National Film Registry'/><category term='2008 In Review'/><category term='Howard Hawks'/><category term='Film Noir'/><category term='1970s'/><category term='1950s'/><category term='War Films'/><category term='Horror Films'/><category term='Fritz Lang'/><category term='Silent Films'/><category term='Sight and Sound Top 10'/><category term='Charles Chaplin'/><category term='John Ford'/><category term='1930s'/><category term='Alfred Hitchcock'/><category term='Television'/><category term='German Cinema'/><category term='Sunday Matinee'/><category term='Animation'/><category term='Buster Keaton'/><category term='2009 in Review'/><title type='text'>Comments on Screen Savour: The General (1927)</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.screensavour.net/feeds/2882451089472285011/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/2882451089472285011/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2009/09/general-1927.html'/><author><name>T.S.</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='31' src='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_iQQyMY0s_7Q/SYbmii5xNxI/AAAAAAAAA08/Mk6itOHr9NU/S220/Typewriter.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>4</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-1182711487575033382</id><published>2009-11-16T19:14:59.265-05:00</published><updated>2009-11-16T19:14:59.265-05:00</updated><title type='text'>Of course this is a definitive review of one of te...</title><content type='html'>Of course this is a definitive review of one of teh greatest of all screen comedires, and arguably Keaton&amp;#39;s masterpiece.  And yes, as you say, it&amp;#39;s the one he&amp;#39;ll be best-remembered by, even if college film students continue to sing the praises of SHERLOCK JR.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You are sorely missed on the blogging circles, that much I can assure you.  Of course it is fully understood that you have a busy life, and there isn&amp;#39;t always time for this.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But I wanted to say hello, and hope we&amp;#39;ll be touching bases soon.  The best always.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/2882451089472285011/comments/default/1182711487575033382'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/2882451089472285011/comments/default/1182711487575033382'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2009/09/general-1927.html?showComment=1258416899265#c1182711487575033382' title=''/><author><name>Sam Juliano</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2009/09/general-1927.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-2882451089472285011' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/posts/default/2882451089472285011' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-633073331'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-6071969117786825165</id><published>2009-09-30T20:03:14.163-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-30T20:03:14.163-04:00</updated><title type='text'>@FilmDr — Thanks for the thoughts. I agree with yo...</title><content type='html'>@FilmDr — Thanks for the thoughts. I agree with you on Annabelle Lee; she is, for the most part, useless to the film, and even her initial scorn for Johnnie is rather ridiculous in its superficiality and the fact that it&amp;#39;s not followed through to its logical conclusion. (It might be Keaton&amp;#39;s only film where he plays a character who is considered fundamentally valuable in its trade and skill, but still he doesn&amp;#39;t come out as a &amp;quot;man&amp;quot; in the eyes of the woman.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I like the structure, and I think that&amp;#39;s one of the film&amp;#39;s most endearing elements. And yes, I&amp;#39;ve heard that anecdote about Keaton playing baseball with his crew in the Oregon town where they shot the film; I&amp;#39;ve also heard that his athleticism really wowed the locals. :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;@MovieMan — Thanks. I think what you say about funniness and greatness existing (mostly) on different planes is true, and I&amp;#39;d even take it a step further and say that it applies to a multitude of genres, particularly as far as cinema is concerned. Comedy is certainly affected by it because I think comedies in general tend to be less ambition in form than drama, musicals, science fiction, etc. But the two you cite are certainly among the great comedies of the last fifty years, and certainly &lt;i&gt;The General&lt;/i&gt;is among the greats period.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/2882451089472285011/comments/default/6071969117786825165'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/2882451089472285011/comments/default/6071969117786825165'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2009/09/general-1927.html?showComment=1254355394163#c6071969117786825165' title=''/><author><name>T.S.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00945932279787919282</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='31' src='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_iQQyMY0s_7Q/SYbmii5xNxI/AAAAAAAAA08/Mk6itOHr9NU/S220/Typewriter.jpg'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2009/09/general-1927.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-2882451089472285011' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/posts/default/2882451089472285011' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-32407462'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-8474138697415039621</id><published>2009-09-30T12:00:23.897-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-30T12:00:23.897-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Really interesting observations here. I find I oft...</title><content type='html'>Really interesting observations here. I find I often have trouble considering a comedy &amp;quot;great&amp;quot; if it isn&amp;#39;t formally ambitious in some way. Funniness and greatness seem to be on different planes, ones which intersect but not extensively. (Mor recent - meaning post 60s - comedies I would consider great include Annie Hall and The Big Lebowski, both of which are visually rich and structurally ambitious.) So I suppose I laugh harder at other Keaton films, but I certainly think this is his greatest work. Although I think I find it funnier than you, and apparently many others, do.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/2882451089472285011/comments/default/8474138697415039621'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/2882451089472285011/comments/default/8474138697415039621'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2009/09/general-1927.html?showComment=1254326423897#c8474138697415039621' title=''/><author><name>MovieMan0283</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11238338958380683893</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2009/09/general-1927.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-2882451089472285011' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/posts/default/2882451089472285011' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-985505097'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-8212746184231086387</id><published>2009-09-28T12:52:49.643-04:00</published><updated>2009-09-28T12:52:49.643-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Nice analysis.  I&amp;#39;ve been waiting for this one...</title><content type='html'>Nice analysis.  I&amp;#39;ve been waiting for this one, because I often show off &lt;i&gt;The General&lt;/i&gt; in a film studies class, and it consistently gets a lively response from students.  I was struck by the treatment of Annabelle Lee.  She is profoundly useless to Johnnie during the action scenes--in marked contrast to Keaton&amp;#39;s balletic abilities in single-handedly operating a train.  I&amp;#39;ve heard of the film having a Baroque structure in the way it sets up two parallel and yet opposite journeys in the first half and the latter half of the film.  Also, isn&amp;#39;t it true that Keaton had his crew play baseball during breaks in much of the shooting?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/2882451089472285011/comments/default/8212746184231086387'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/2882451089472285011/comments/default/8212746184231086387'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2009/09/general-1927.html?showComment=1254156769643#c8212746184231086387' title=''/><author><name>FilmDr</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03073505923746994988</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='03380008750936550949'/><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_gTka0I9Xl-8/SVfDjDORYLI/AAAAAAAAA50/48E3qtXAtIY/S220/doctor.jpg'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.screensavour.net/2009/09/general-1927.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8214297712303916286.post-2882451089472285011' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8214297712303916286/posts/default/2882451089472285011' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-42719914'/></entry></feed>
